Well, here we are again, another week and another instalment
from Sustainability Inc. But first an interesting bit of news; Google spends $200m
on another wind farm, now that is another step in the right direction. Despite,
I am sure some people thinking this is just a cynical PR stunt. Particularly in
light of the bad press Google have received about not paying their fair share
of tax and Green Peace’s report on energy use by their servers being the same
as San Diego’s, when operating at full strength. But so what, this is another step in the
right direction and sets a good example for big business and consumers. If you
want to operate a large energy consuming business, then build a sustainable way
of generating that energy. While
at the same time developing more energy efficient ways of producing your goods
and services.
Here is a link to the full article http://money.cnn.com/2013/01/09/technology/google-wind-farm/index.html
Now back to the usual, if you remember last week we looked
at the importance of politics and policy in the sustainability arena. This week
it is the turn of economics. There is of importance of in sustainability and
that is as one of the three pillars of the triple bottom line that make up a
sustainable business. But, in this article I intend to get under the skin of why
it is important, looking at how sustainability and economics are at logger
heads with each other and why an understanding of the progress being made in
the economics/sustainability will aid a sustainability professional in their
role.
Firstly, a basic definition of economics courtesy of
Investepedia: -
‘A
social science that studies how individuals, governments, firms and
nations make choices on allocating scarce resources to satisfy their
unlimited wants. Economics can generally be broken down into: macroeconomics,
which concentrates on the behaviour of the aggregate economy; and
microeconomics, which focuses on individual consumers.’
And now a definition of Sustainability: -
‘Sustainable
development is development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the needs of future generations to meet their own needs’. (Brundtland,
1987)
Economics looks at the way scares resources are turned into
goods that are consumed by the market, it does not look at how these stocks,
either natural or human can be replenished which would support the consumption
for future generations. Also, by economic definition it is only when something
becomes scares that it becomes valuable. Meaning that sustainability works
against economics, because it looks to make resources renewable.
The fundamentals of economics have not been rethought since
the time of Adam Smith and ‘The Invisible Hand’ some 200 years ago, taking
regulations, human culture, interaction and quality of life as given. Economic
theory needs to be updated to take into account these new factors and this is
where ‘sustainable economics’ comes in.
Interesting Reading:
The Big Idea: The Sustainable Economy, (2011)
Harvard Business Review
Toward an Economics of
Sustainability, (1997)
World Watch Institute
The Institute of New Economic Thinking